About the author: Luis Batres

Luis A. Batres is an international attorney living in Miami. He obtained his law degree from Francisco Marroquin University in Guatemala and later received his Masters Degree in Comparative Law from the University of Miami. Self described as a firm believer in libertarian principles of limited government and the U.S Constitution. His interests include history, Gracie Jiu-Jitsu, and the defense of individual freedoms.

View all articles by Luis Batres
  • MATTHEW

    WHOA! GOOD STUFF!

  • Marge

    Great advice and great information.

  • http://twitter.com/Ed1Ranger Ed@RangerSelfDefense

    Wow! Glad I found this site, where a tough woman writes about the real issues. The government wants to take your guns so they can control you and steal everything you own. Many major gun confiscations are followed by genocides of the citizens. Beware and eternally vigilant. The government wants your guns! Repeal all un-Constitutional laws and support the 2nd Amendment.

  • Andrew

    If an armed society is a polite society, then the U.S. would be the most polite in the industrialized world. The U.S. is rife with guns, yet our crime rate, especially violent crime rate, is the highest in the industrialized world. And criminals know FULL WELL how many guns are out there, but this doesn’t seem to stop them. Your argument is a complete fail. Furthermore, Kleck’s research is widely discredited, and no scientist on the planet agrees with his 2.5 million extrapolation which is HIGHLY flawed. Even more baffling is that some of his survey participants indicated MULTIPLE defensive acts during the time period in-question, which is highly suggestive that these were misinterpreted as defensive acts, or actually criminal acts on the part of the participants. However, he was citing these essentially as self-defense successes. You also fail to cite the multiple, multiple, multiple other studies which find the risks of having a gun in the home (suicide, domestic violence, accidents) FAR outweigh any supposed benefits (self-defense is apparently the only one). The science is not on your side, and hasn’t been for some time. Knowing this, the NRA actually bullied Congress to stop funding any studies that might attempt to study these issues. The NRA is not exactly a fan of science or public health, it seems.

    Non-scientists should not cite scientific research unless they understand it fully, and you do not understand it. You’re entitled to your opinion, but opinions based on misinformation should not be taken very seriously.

No Holding Back: 15 Hilarious Amazon Reviews of Hillary Clinton’s ‘Hard Choices’
Lawyers Fight Back: DC’s Top Lawyer Attempted to Halt the Ruling that Residents Could Carry Registered Firearms in Public
John Boehner Writes an Op-Ed on the Obama Lawsuit, No Mention of Immigration
Leave Kerry Alone! White House Defends John Kerry’s Ineffectual Efforts to Mediate Temporary Peace Between Israel and Hamas
Women of WWI: 10 Heroic Women You’ve Never Heard Of
Top Neuroscientist Arrested at Arizona Airport for Pointing his AR-15 the Wrong Way
‘Blasphemous’: Pakistani Mob Kills Woman and Girls Over Facebook Post
Hamas Leader: Israel is Occupying Palestinian Land, There will Be No Peace Until They’re Out [VIDEO]
The Facts are Overrated: Liberal News Site ‘Think Progress’ Runs False Story on Michele Bachmann
Temper, Temper: North Korea Threatens Nuclear Strike on White House
‘Obama Will Take Care of Us’: Illegal Immigrants Chant this Mantra as They Cross the Border
The Thug Life: Two Carjackers Plow into Church Charity, Kill 3 Children and Leave the Mom Clinging for Her Life
Act Of God: Lightning Strike Hits Venice Beach, 1 Killed and 7 Hospitalized