It seems like the liberal judges of America don’t give two sh*ts about America’s safety.
Now, a second federal appeals court ruled against President Trump’s revised travel ban on Monday.
This is coming from the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in San Francisco, CA.
It is the latest decision in a string of court rulings rejecting the Trump admin’s efforts to restrict travel from several Islamic nations known for terror.
A request of review by the Supreme Court has already been issued by this administration regarding a similar decision from the US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Richmond, VA.
The new ruling affirmed a March decision from Judge Derrick K. Watson, of the Federal District Court in Hawaii.
Judge Watson blocked major parts of the revised order, saying they violated the Constitution’s ban on a government establishment of religion.
Judge Watson wrote that the statements of Mr. Trump and his advisers made clear that his executive order amounted to an attempt to disfavor Muslims.
“A reasonable, objective observer — enlightened by the specific historical context, contemporaneous public statements and specific sequence of events leading to its issuance — would conclude that the executive order was issued with a purpose to disfavor a particular religion,” Judge Watson wrote.
In an earlier decision, the Ninth Circuit in February blocked Mr. Trump’s original travel ban. After that ruling, Mr. Trump narrowed the scope of his initial executive order, issued on Jan. 27, a week into his presidency.
The new order’s 90-day suspension of entry from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen was more limited and subject to case-by-case exceptions.
It omitted Iraq, which had been listed in the earlier order, and it removed a complete ban on Syrian refugees.
It also deleted explicit references to religion.
Will Trump’s travel ban ever get cleared?
Is it time for the president to take a new approach to solving the nation’s increasing terror threat?
Give us your thoughts below.