Americans never give up your guns

cold-dead-handsThese days, there are few few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bear arms and use deadly force to defend one’s self and possessions.

This will probably come as a total shock to most of my Western readers, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth. This was, of course, when we were free under the Tsar. Weapons, from swords and spears to pistols, rifles and shotguns were everywhere, common items. People carried them concealed, they carried them holstered. Fighting knives were a prominent part of many traditional attires and those little tubes criss crossing on the costumes of Cossacks and various Caucasian peoples? Well those are bullet holders for rifles.

Various armies, such as the Poles, during the Смута (Times of Troubles), or Napoleon, or the Germans even as the Tsarist state collapsed under the weight of WW1 and Wall Street monies, found that holding Russian lands was much much harder than taking them and taking was no easy walk in the park but a blood bath all its own. In holding, one faced an extremely well armed and aggressive population Hell bent on exterminating or driving out the aggressor.

This well armed population was what allowed the various White factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the Reds. It should be noted that many of these armies were armed peasants, villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own. If it had not been for Washington’s clandestine support of and for the Reds, history would have gone quite differently.

Moscow fell, for example, not from a lack of weapons to defend it, but from the lieing guile of the Reds. Ten thousand Reds took Moscow and were opposed only by some few hundreds of officer cadets and their instructors. Even then the battle was fierce and losses high. However, in the city alone, at that time, lived over 30,000 military officers (both active and retired), all with their own issued weapons and ammunition, plus tens of thousands of other citizens who were armed. The Soviets promised to leave them all alone if they did not intervene. They did not and for that were asked afterwards to come register themselves and their weapons: where they were promptly shot.

Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for…


  • Joshua Wander
  • Hoodoo H


  • S Rubicon

    Confiscation has historically lead to the murder of citizens by the very government that disarmed the people. Registration is merely a means to know where authorities need to go to take away guns. Its all a plan to control the people by some whose actions are eerily similar to past thugs, tyrants, dictators, and evildoers!

  • Jaime Cancio

    Remember always the Second Amendment states the right to bare arms; that includes anything you can conceive that can be utilized as a device to protect your person, your family and your children. Take away the firearm, there are knifes, swords, axes, take those away there is my two pound hammer, take that away I will show some tricks with chain, wire or rope, take that away I will show another reason or two or three or more why God gaves us hands – and if nothing else I have a brain and am highly adaptive – God help us all if Tim McVey comes to mind and we see how effective mental inventiveness can be – he only killed 168 people at one time and injured another 600-2,000. No, I don’t invite taking firearms away from American citizens – Americans are to damned inventive and couple that to a person will to do bad things we are all in trouble. Start looking at all the recent events where the shooter(s) also brought with them explosive devices – the trend has already headed in that direction. The only thing proved at the recent CT killings – no gun laws (91 laws that didn’t work), no government agency and no police agency were able to prevent this attack – which leads to the ultimate question – if our laws cannot protect us our families and our children; if the government and the police cannot protect us – who is… left to protect us? And damn all the politicians who only think passing another law will protect us – doing so only to get their names in the news to promote themselves and their agendas that has proven so well don’t protect us.

    The safest nation in the world where there is no murder and no major crime is Switzerland and by law every adult male has to have two years of military training and in their home a fully automatic machine gun (usually in 7.62 Nato/.308 caliber) and a minimum 400 rounds of ammunition. Many also own firearms of 5.56mm/.223 Remington to augment their primary firearm. And in the realm of national defense Switzerland is the only nation in the world that can mount a national army of some 600,000 in thirty minutes…this comment (personal) in a shooting incident with shots fired it took the local police 43 minutes to arrive on scene and another twelve minutes before they came to my door (no I was not the shooter) – how effective is that protection when I could have ordered Pizza and got it sooner. By-the-way, I believe the police officer protecting the firemen in a recent story, putting his own life in jeparody several times is a true hero deserving our respect, honor and award; however, in the CT I think the police there were all cowards waiting until they amassed and could provide mutual protection – not one officer there performing any type of heroics to immediate engage the shooter to put a stop to the shooter. The other parents there, besides the parents who lost children, all of us better understand, we had better be very thankful the shooter committed suicide because the police, other than showing up, didn’t stop the shooter. If the shooter had kept killing how many more adults and children could have been killed and then the shooter could of engaged in a firefight with the police. If the police are not willing to put their lives on the line; they are not earning their pay – they have no right to their pay – fire the police chief and all the other police on that scene who did nothing to protect those who could of been killed. I say it again – cowards. That is what I believe.

  • Rattlerjake

    Something I never see on any of these articles about this topic is what system is in place for gun owners when the government makes the move to confiscate your weapons. Granted if they show up at my door (one or a dozen) I’ll shoot first and ask questions later, but this likely will not be enough. We gun owners need to establish contact plans of who to immediately contact that will come join the fight. I have several ex-mil neighbors and we are all prepared for this event, but there are many good gun guys (and gals) that have no one in the neighborhood to come help them protect their rights. Let’s put our heads together and make something happen, being organized is just as important as being armed!

Trending Now on GJWHG