‘Blood on Your Hands’: Former New York Times Executive Editor Speaks Out Against the Obama Administration’s Attempts to Limit Media Coverage

pic_giant_051514_SM_Sanctimonious-Times-Jill-Abramson-621x330Editor’s Note: Obama frequently promised a more transparent government. I’d be surprised if anyone outside his administration has a clear understanding of what’s going on a the White House.

In January of 2014, former New York Times Executive Editor Jill Abramson described the Obama administration as “the most secretive White House she’s ever dealt with.”

Then, during a speech Wednesday at the Chautauqua Institution, Abramson revealed to the audience even more insider information on how Obama officials handle the media, according to Newsbusters.

“I have heard Obama officials say more than once, ‘You will have blood on your hands if you publish this story,”

It’s a question of balancing competing interests, the government’s claims versus the public’s right to know. “When someone says, ‘You’ll have blood on your hands,’ you pause and take it very seriously,”

Next, Abramson explained how her views shifted after 9/11. Because President Bush’s former Press Secretary Ari Fleischer requested that the NY Times and other major media outlets not publish sources or methods the intelligence community was using after the attacks took place. Her publication followed the order for a “few years.” However, they eventually went against it by running a story about warrantless wiretapping of suspected terrorist contacts.

This article continues at ijreview.com

Share Your Comments
Trending Now on GJWHG