A no-fly zone and regime change became their biggest points of contention.
On a night that began with Bernie Sanders apologizing for his campaign aides improperly accessing rival presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s voter database, it was not political shenanigans but pronounced foreign policy differences between the two leading Democratic candidates that proved to be a key fault line in the third Democratic debate Saturday in Manchester, New Hampshire.
It is an issue that also created strange political bedfellows, with the Democratic candidates who disagreed with each other finding kindred spirits among the Republican presidential contenders.
At the ABC News debate, Democratic front-runner Clinton called for a no-fly zone over Syria. “One of the reasons why I have advocated for a no-fly zone is in order to create those safe refuges within Syria, to try to protect people on the ground both from Assad’s forces, who are continuing to drop barrel bombs, and from ISIS,” she said, calling for a diplomatic effort toward that end. “A no-fly zone would prevent the outflow of refugees and give us a chance to have some safe spaces.”
Clinton’s rationale for a no-fly zone—to support the rebels battling the Assad regime and protect refugees—is similar to that of Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio. In an August 25 op-ed for Foreign Policy, the U.S. senator from Florida offered his rationale: “The United States should work with our allies, both Arab and European, to impose a no-fly zone over parts of Syria that will prevent Assad’s air force from dropping barrel bombs and chlorine gas bombs on civilian neighborhoods.”
Both Clinton and Rubio believe the U.S. should go after Assad as well as the Islamic State jihadist group that has taken over parts of Syria. “If the United States does not lead, there is not another leader,” Clinton said Saturday. “There is a vacuum.” Rubio has used uncannily similar rhetoric: “When America doesn’t lead, what’s left behind is a vacuum, and the vacuum leads to chaos.”
Clinton’s closest Democratic rival, Bernie Sanders, opposes a no-fly zone, and argued in the debate that the U.S. should steer clear of toppling dictators and avoid using military power to promote democracy abroad.
“Our differences are fairly deep on this issue. We disagreed on the war in Iraq,” Sanders said. “I worry too much that Secretary Clinton is too much into regime change and a little bit too aggressive without knowing what the unintended consequences might be.
Read more: Bloomberg
- ANTIFA Protester Hits MAGA Man, Then All Hell Breaks Loose [Video]
- Delta Airlines Kicks Ann Coulter Out of Her Seat and Boy Was That the Wrong Decision…
- Officer Mohamed Noor Refuses to Cooperate With Investigators After Shooting Dead Yoga Teacher
- Cop Mohammed Noor Shot Yoga Teacher From Patrol Car, While Reaching Over His Partner
- Trump Admin Wins Second Time with Travel Ban, Strict Enforcement…
- Watch: Revolver or Semi-Auto for a Conceal Carry Weapon?
- Watch: Al Sharpton’s Epic Fails When Reading Teleprompter Will Have You Rolling With Laughter, ‘The Thigh (Thai) Militarty’
- Congress Fails to Include Majority of Trump’s Budget Cuts in House GOP Budget Plan
- 10,000 New ICE Agents are Ordered to Crackdown on Sanctuary Cities
- Susan Rice Is Not Going to Testify About Unmasking Trump Supporters
- Chris Hemsworth Thinks a Woman Should be the New Bond…
- Haitian Official Who Exposed the Clinton Foundation is Found With Gun-Shot to Head
- College Students Love Socialism, But Can’t Define It [VIDEO]
- Yoga Teacher Shot Down by Police After Calling in a Possible Assault
- Krauthammer Calls GOP Repeal and Replace an ‘Epic Fail’, Reveals Why in Detail
- Kid Rock Releases Senate Platform: ‘If You Work Your Butt Off and Pay Taxes…’
- Harvard Law Professor, Alan Dershowitz: Liberals Searching for ‘Crimes That Don’t Exist’
- Mayor of London Sadiq Khan Refuses to ‘Roll Out Red Carpet’ and Give Full State Visit for President Donald Trump