Hillary Clinton’s email scandal will likely be looming over the Democratic presidential candidate throughout the rest of the primary season as federal prosecutors have just begun contacting the lawyers of her top aides in order to set up formal interviews.
The Los Angeles Times, which reported the pending interviews, didn’t name which aides would be called in for questioning by FBI agents and prosecutors, but contacted Philippe Reines, Huma Abedin, Jake Sullivan and Cheryl Mills, who all worked closely with Clinton during her time as secretary of the state.
None of the lawyers for the foursome would speak on the record about the investigation.
Prosecutors are also expected to bring Clinton in for an interview, but the newspaper had no information about timing.
Another aide, IT staffer Bryan Pagliano, was granted immunity by federal prosecutors and provided security logs for Clinton’s server that revealed no evidence of foreign hacking, the paper reported.
‘The interviews are critical to understand the volume of information they have accumulated,’ James McJunkin, the former head of the FBI’s Washington field office, told the Los Angeles times.
‘They are likely nearing the end of the investigation and the agents need to interview these people to put the information in context,’ he continued.
‘They will then spend time aligning these statements with other information, emails, classified documents, etc., to determine whether there is a prosecutable case.’
The Justice Department and the FBI opened up their investigation in July upon receiving a security referral from the inspector general of the intelligence community, who concluded at the time that Clinton had sent emails deemed ‘secret,’ the highest level of classification, through her personal email system.
The inspector general’s office was leafing through the 30,500 emails Clinton had turned over from her homebrew server that she said were work-related.
‘None of the emails we reviewed has classification or dissemination markings, but some included [intelligence community]-derived classified information and should have been handled as classified appropriately marked, and transmitted via a secure network,’ Inspector General I. Charles McCollough wrote Congress in a letter at the start of the investigation.
Previously, the inspector general and the State Department were shown to be in a dispute over whether these correspondences should be considered classified.
- For Those of You Who Thought Trump Bankrupted the Secret Service, Here is the Real Story…
- BLM Activist Makes List of Requests for White People: ‘give up the home you own to a black or brown family.’
- Armed Intruder Breaks into Family’s Apartment, Tries Raping Daughter — Enter the Pissed Off Father…
- Policewoman Shoots Down 4 Jihadis by Herself — Video Footage Revealed
- Anti-Trump Protester Shot in Groin With Tear-Gas Canister During Phoenix Rally [Video]
- REPORT: Debbie Wasserman Schultz’ IT Aide May Have Sold State Secrets to Russia, Pakistan
- Watch: Hipsters Believe America Should Model Economy Like Venezuela’s to Have Income Equality
- Pope Francis Claims Migrants’ Rights Overrule Importance of National Security
- State Senator Who Called for Trump Assassination is Kicked Out of…
- Question: Should Lawmakers Investigate James Comey and Robert Mueller?
- Bust… A Move? 92yr-Old Woman and Police Officer Have a Dance Off [Watch]
- Chick Lectures Crowd of White Women: ‘I Believe White People Are Born Into Not Being Human’ [Video]
- Hey Ladies: Here is a List of Compact 9mm Concealed Carry Guns that Cost Less Than $600
- VIDEO: Funny Man Jim Carrey Not So Funny Anymore — ‘Cold Dead Hand’ Music Video Mocs Gun Owners
- Neo-Nazi Groups are Now Recognized as Terrorist Organizations — Shouldn’t Black Lives Matter Also?
- Trump’s Border Wall Gets Full Funding with $1.6BIL Price-Tag
- If Trump is Responsible for Death at Charlottesville, Then Isn’t Obama Responsible for these 5 Murders?
- Woman is Stabbed. Two Unarmed Men Try Saving Her, Get Stabbed. Then Dude With Gun Shows Up…