Getting Freaky Down Under: Australian Judge Has No Problem With Incest, Because We Have Abortion

Screen Shot 2014-07-19 at 9.27.22 AMEditor’s Note: Judge Garry Neilson likens incest to homosexuality; which was once seen as criminal and ‘unnatural’, but recently has been “accepted”. Good ol’ Judge Garry believes that now, with the amount of contraceptives and availability of abortion, incest is just another perversion that should be “accepted”. What is next? Beastiality?

A judge in Australia has been criticised after saying incest may no longer be a taboo and that the community may now accept consensual sex between adult siblings.

Judge Garry Neilson, from the district court in the state of New South Wales, likened incest to homosexuality, which was once regarded as criminal and “unnatural” but is now widely accepted.

He said incest was now only a crime because it may lead to abnormalities in offspring but this rationale was increasingly irrelevant because of the availability of contraception and abortion.

“A jury might find nothing untoward in the advance of a brother towards his sister once she had sexually matured, had sexual relationships with other men and was now ‘available’, not having [a] sexual partner,” the judge said.

“If this was the 1950s and you had a jury of 12 men there, which is what you’d invariably have, they would say it’s unnatural for a man to be interested in another man or a man being interested in a boy. Those things have gone.”

Judge Neilson made the comments during the trial of a brother charged with raping his younger sister. The man has pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting his sister when she was 10 or 11 years old in 1973 or 1974 but has pleaded not guilty to charges relating to sex they had in 1981, when she was 18 and he was 26.

This article continues at Telegraph.co.uk

Share Your Comments
Trending Now on GJWHG