Why the fight over access to Hillary Clinton matters
Journalists complaining about getting more access to political candidates is nothing new, but the escalating tensions between the press and the Clinton campaign expose what we think could end up looking like a big strategic blunder for the Democratic candidate. Clinton, staffed by plenty of White House alums, is essentially running as a presidential incumbent, except without a day job. By trying to play by the same set of rules that govern the White House press corps (background briefings, tightly regulated pool coverage, and very limited questions to the principal), Team Clinton is playing into the exact narrative they’ve pledged to avoid – appearing to hold a coronation, not a contest. If the media feels as if Clinton has the attitude that her campaign is above press accountability, the coverage is going to reflect that. And by the way, this isn’t just about playing nice with reporters and bringing donuts to the back of the campaign bus. It’s about treating the process with respect.
And it’s showing
Clinton backers make a point we gave a nod to yesterday, which is that the bad press and perceived controversies are resonating a LOT more in the Acela Corridor than with the base in primary states right now. (See the Des Moines Register/ Bloomberg poll showing Clinton holding strong with Iowa Democrats.) But these issues ARE making a dent in her national support. A new CNN/ORC poll out this morning shows that a majority – 57 percent – now say that Clinton is not honest and trustworthy, up from 49 percent in March. And she’s now upside-down on favorability (46% favorable/50% unfavorable) – a reversal from earlier this year. Yes, she’s primarily hurting with independents and still holding strong with Dems, but does anyone think that she can afford to have erosion like this all year? She has to act like she’s willing to work for this. And dealing with the press corps that has little problem getting access to the 16 Republicans running is one of the necessary evils of running for president. Ultimately, Clinton is playing to type and what she needs right now are moments that do exactly the opposite.
Could June 13 be a chance for Clinton to turn the page?
Team Clinton announced yesterday that her “official campaign launch” will be held at Franklin D. Roosevelt Four Freedoms Park in New York City on June 13. Between a campaign office in Brooklyn and a launch on Roosevelt Island, she’s certainly all-in on New York. We have some pause about this geographic strategy. Too much NYC can turn off Midwestern voters. And, like it or not, by wrapping her arms around the Roosevelts, she’s all-in on the dynasty issue too. As our sister publication The Lid wrote yesterday, the big speech could give her a chance to turn the page on any negative coverage from her “low-key” rollout. And the locale is somewhat of an unexpected choice, given all the speculation that – if she was to choose New York for the launch -she’d have opted to make her backdrop Seneca Falls or the Susan B. Anthony house in Rochester. Those picks would have been an explicit nod to the glass ceiling argument. Instead, she’s pointing to the duo of Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt as a model. It’s historically ambitious. Obviously, many a Democrat would love Roosevelt comparisons, but can a campaign be too ham handed about grasping for the comparison?
Big news for Rand Paul in Nevada
During the chaotic end to the legislative session in Nevada, lawmakers failed to hold a vote on a bill that would have allowed the state to swap its presidential caucus for a primary. From the Las Vegas Review-Journal: “Republicans had argued that the change would preserve the state’s early role in the presidential selection process and boost voter participation. The change would have weakened the influence of grass-roots party activists who are more motivated to turn out for precinct caucuses and in recent years have gained control of the state Republican Party.” Bottom line: this is big news for Rand Paul, who can keep banking on his dedicated supporters to turn out for the more time-intensive caucuses. And it’s disappointing for GOP candidates who were hoping that a primary would turn out a broader swathe of Nevada’s GOP primary voters and hand someone a boost after the Iowa-New Hampshire-South Carolina trifecta.
Read more: NBC News