Susan Rice has been under the spotlight ever since people caught wind that she was responsible for the unmasking of Trump’s team. Actually, it’s one of the biggest news stories trending in this week’s cycle.
Yet, the MSM is refusing to cover a minute of the scandal and is attempting to keep their audience in the dark.
The story seems to keep growing as the days go by, though. Buried in Wall Street Journal article, new pieces of evidence have come to light.
[T]he WSJ provides two new pieces of incremental information: i) in addition to Michael Flynn, at least one more member of the Trump transition team was “unmasked” in intelligence reports due to multiple foreign conversations that weren’t related to Russia; and ii) Rice wasn’t the administration official who instigated Mr. Flynn’s unmasking, confirming there is at least one more high-level official giving “unmasking” orders.
The WSJ then reports that Rice had requested the unmasking of at least one transition official — not Mr. Flynn — who was part of multiple foreign conversations that weren’t related to Russia.
And the punchline: “The Republican official and others said Ms. Rice wasn’t the administration official who instigated Mr. Flynn’s unmasking.”
Why is this a big deal?
Well simply put, she said she was the only one involved and wasn’t ‘allowed’ to share any of the information.
Asked if she would testify, Susan Rice freezes, stammers, then changes subject to Russia. pic.twitter.com/wj2TQ9saeU
— Chris Menahan 🔹 (@infolibnews) April 4, 2017
Clearly whomever asked for Flynn’s name to be unveiled couldn’t keep their mouth shut and shared it with someone else. The information did end up in the Washington Post and the NY Times after all.
Yes, you read that right.
How many more felonies do you think the Obama admin. committed just in this one case? Only time will tell now.