BREAKING: Supreme Court Makes EMERGENCY Ruling About Tomorrow’s Election…

BOOM! This is a win! Trump has been telling his supporters to watch for strange activity at the polls tomorrow. The Left twisted his words, saying Trump wanted his supporters to intimidate people, in particular minorities, out of voting. They filed an emergency request with the U.S. Supreme court. And it FLOPPED!

The left is going bonkers over GOP nominee Donald Trump’s suggestions to supporters to be actively alert to irregularities at polling locations this election day.

“Make sure everything is on the up and up,” the Republican nominee said. “So go to your place and vote. And go pick some other place and go sit there with your friends and make sure it’s on the up and up. Because you know what, that’s a big, big problem in this country and nobody wants to talk about it.”

Democrats and their media have all transformed Trump’s suggestions for citizens to be active poll watchers into alleged attempts to intimidate voters — specifically, minority voters.

Trending: Man Goes on Mass Stabbing at 3-Year-Old’s Birthday Party

They’ve even made a federal case of the matter — literally — filing an emergency request with the U.S. Supreme court. However, today, on the eve of the election, the U.S. Supreme Court denied Democrats’ request.

As the Washington Times reports:

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday denied an emergency request by the Ohio Democratic Party to reinstate a lower court’s order that sought to bar Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and his supporters from intimidating voters at the polls.

The ruling marks another victory for Republicans, who have fought off a series of lawsuits in at least seven states that were brought by Democrats in the homestretch of the presidential race.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote separately from the order that she voted to deny the request because Ohio law already forbids voter intimidation.

Democrats filed the lawsuit in Ohio, alleging that the Trump campaign has sought to encourage supporters monitor polling places on Election Day and to act in ways that might intimidate voters.

Just have to ask, what about Trump’s statement suggests acting “in ways that might intimidate voters”?

A federal judge sided Friday with Democrats and issued a temporary restraining order that prohibited both presidential campaigns from a variety of activities around polling places, including photographing prospective voters and their vehicles or interrogating or harassing voters inside polling places.

But in an order issued Sunday, a three-judge panel from the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the lower court ruling, concluding that the Ohio Democratic Party “did not demonstrate before the district court a likelihood of success on the merits, and that all of the requisite factors weigh in favor of granting the stay.”

Today’s SCOTUS ruling comes on the heels of federal courts rejecting similar Democrat claims in other states.

Democrats have filed similar lawsuits in Arizona, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Michigan.

Federal courts have already rejected claims filed in Arizona, Nevada and New Jersey.

Following a Monday hearing in the North Carolina lawsuit, the Associated Press reported that U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles did not find evidence that Republicans and presidential candidate Donald Trump wanted supporters to intimidate North Carolina minority voters. However, the federal judge said she will keep an eye on what happens Tuesday and could consider sanctions there appears to be evidence of a coordinated effort to turn away voters in minority neighborhoods.

Cases brought in Pennsylvania and Michigan are still pending.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.