CLINTON AND RUBIO: Gain Up Against Cruz on Foreign Policy

Screen Shot 2015-12-20 at 9.28.39 AMDo we really want a candidate that agrees with Clinton on anything?

A no-fly zone and regime change became their biggest points of contention.

On a night that began with Bernie Sanders apologizing for his campaign aides improperly accessing rival presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s voter database, it was not political shenanigans but pronounced foreign policy differences between the two leading Democratic candidates that proved to be a key fault line in the third Democratic debate Saturday in Manchester, New Hampshire.

It is an issue that also created strange political bedfellows, with the Democratic candidates who disagreed with each other finding kindred spirits among the Republican presidential contenders.

Trending: REVEALED: Secret Tape of Woman Being Bribed to Accuse Trump of Sexual Harassment

At the ABC News debate, Democratic front-runner Clinton called for a no-fly zone over Syria. “One of the reasons why I have advocated for a no-fly zone is in order to create those safe refuges within Syria, to try to protect people on the ground both from Assad’s forces, who are continuing to drop barrel bombs, and from ISIS,” she said, calling for a diplomatic effort toward that end. “A no-fly zone would prevent the outflow of refugees and give us a chance to have some safe spaces.”

Clinton’s rationale for a no-fly zone—to support the rebels battling the Assad regime and protect refugees—is similar to that of Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio. In an August 25 op-ed for Foreign Policy, the U.S. senator from Florida offered his rationale: “The United States should work with our allies, both Arab and European, to impose a no-fly zone over parts of Syria that will prevent Assad’s air force from dropping barrel bombs and chlorine gas bombs on civilian neighborhoods.”

Both Clinton and Rubio believe the U.S. should go after Assad as well as the Islamic State jihadist group that has taken over parts of Syria.  “If the United States does not lead, there is not another leader,” Clinton said Saturday. “There is a vacuum.” Rubio has used uncannily similar rhetoric: “When America doesn’t lead, what’s left behind is a vacuum, and the vacuum leads to chaos.”

Clinton’s closest Democratic rival, Bernie Sanders, opposes a no-fly zone, and argued in the debate that the U.S. should steer clear of toppling dictators and avoid using military power to promote democracy abroad.

“Our differences are fairly deep on this issue. We disagreed on the war in Iraq,” Sanders said. “I worry too much that Secretary Clinton is too much into regime change and a little bit too aggressive without knowing what the unintended consequences might be.

Read more: Bloomberg


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.