Lawyers Fight Back: DC’s Top Lawyer Attempted to Halt the Ruling that Residents Could Carry Registered Firearms in Public

Burning_ConstitutionEditor’s Note: The police are “very troubled” about citizens being able to practice their Second Amendment rights. Disturbing. Very disturbing.

The District’s top lawyer on Monday sought to temporarily halt a federal court ruling allowing thousands of city residents with registered handguns — as well as legal gun owners from other states — to carry firearms on the streets of the nation’s capital.

The ruling, which upended the city’s decades-old restrictions on carrying handguns in public, created confusion and concern as officials grappled with its implications. The law was declared unconstitutional in an opinion released over the weekend, leaving police scrambling to give clear direction to officers.

D.C. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier told her officers Monday that they could no longer stop someone simply for carrying a gun in public; they would need suspicion that a crime had been committed. For visitors who carry guns into the city, police will need to determine whether they are following the laws of their home state.

Trending: Trump Gives Public Ridicule to John Kerry: ‘Stay Away…You Are Hurting Your Country’

“We understand that the immediate implementation of this ruling creates safety concerns for our members and our community,” Lanier wrote in a memo to police officers Monday. She instructed them to “continue to serve the best interest of public safety while respecting individual rights.”

Police urged officers to contact a department lawyer, on call around the clock, with questions.

D.C. officials have argued that the gun law — among the strictest in the nation — has been a pillar of their public safety strategy in a city that has historically been beset by gun violence. Mayor Vincent C. Gray (D) said Monday that he was “very troubled” by the decision. He appealed to people who live elsewhere to refrain from bringing guns into the city.

The decision, which is likely to be appealed, came five years after a lawsuit challenged the District’s outright prohibition on carrying handguns. The case is among a series of legal efforts taking on gun restrictions nationwide. It followed the 2008 landmark Supreme Court decision that used a D.C. case to declare that the Second Amendment guarantees a person’s right to own a firearm for self-defense.

U.S. District Judge Frederick J. Scullin Jr., a senior judge who normally sits in Upstate New York, struck down the city’s law because there is no process for issuing carry licenses to registered gun owners. Citing several recent court opinions, the judge found that “there is no longer any basis on which this court can conclude that the District of Columbia’s total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is constitutional.”

He suggested city officials could create a new licensing system “consistent with constitutional standards enabling people to exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms.”

On Monday, officials asked the judge to stop the order from taking effect for at least six months “in the interest of public safety and clarity.” They said it would allow time to file an appeal or for the D.C. Council to rewrite the law. It was not clear when Scullin would rule on the city’s motion.

Council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D) said that the panel is on summer break until late September but that it’s possible lawmakers could return for an emergency session to address the issue. “If prosecutors need legislative action, then, of course we’ll consider that,” he said.

This article continues at


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.