Police Officer is Suing GLOCK for This Outrageous Reason–Will He Win?

Screen Shot 2016-08-30 at 10.05.07 AMWhen you hold a gun there are certain safety protocols to go through. It’s expected an officer of the law knows these steps by heart. Apparently one officer didn’t and decided to sue the gun manufacturer for his mistake.

By Bob Owens

When you point a loaded gun at your leg and pull the trigger, you shouldn’t be the least bit surprised at hearing a “bang” and seeing a geyser of blood erupt from the damaged limb. The gun did precisely what it was supposed to do; you made a stupid decision.

That’s pretty much common sense to everyone, except, apparently for Officer Larry Jones.

A $75,000 personal injury case against Glock filed by an Arkansas policeman has been scheduled for trial in a federal court, according to the final scheduling order issued last week.

The jury trial will start Aug. 21, 2017, in a federal court in Helena, Arkansas, the order says. Final arguments and discovery exhibits are due in the beginning months of the year.

The plaintiff in the case, Larry Jones, of Cherry Valley, Arkansas, was injured when his Glock 19C pistol discharged unexpectedly at the shooting range in June 2013, the lawsuit says. At the time he was trying to attach a tactical light.

According to the complaint, the pistol had not been modified or changed since he bought it in December 2000. The lawsuit alleges Glock sold the pistol “in a defective condition which rendered (it) unreasonably dangerous.”

Larry Jones of  Cherry Valley, Arkansas apparently violated every single rule of gun safety, and wants $75,000 for the Glock 19C (ported G19) working specifically as it was designed to work?

That’s absurd, and I sincerely hope that the judge not only throws this case out with prejudice, but that he orders Jones to pay for Glock’s legal expenses in this case.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.